The AHPRA Experience Monitor began as a structured pathway for doctors experiencing AHPRA notifications. It has evolved into a broader platform for all AHPRA-regulated practitioners to contribute anonymous feedback across the full range of regulatory interactions.
Organisational endorsement: To be determined
Many practitioners describe stress, uncertainty, and professional disruption in their interactions with AHPRA — not only when facing notifications, but in day-to-day encounters with fees, CPD obligations, digital services, and governance decisions. This initiative provides a structured, anonymous mechanism to capture those experiences systematically, across all regulated professions, continuously rather than in one-off surveys.
Notification and investigation experience remains the most detailed and sensitive pathway, designed for practitioners who have received an AHPRA notification or been subject to an investigation. The additional pathways broaden the platform without diminishing the rigour or prominence of that core function.
The original and most detailed pathway. Covers notification process, timeliness, communication, interim restrictions, wellbeing impact, perceived fairness and proportionality, outcome, and longitudinal updates via case number.
Captures practitioner views on fee levels across professions, how fees are set and communicated, cross-profession funding distribution, and what transparency improvements are most valued.
Collects feedback on AHPRA's governance structures, national board composition, the appointment process, accountability mechanisms, and overall confidence in the regulatory framework.
Covers CPD obligations and their appropriateness, the usability of AHPRA's online portal, Practitioner Lookup, responsiveness to general enquiries, and views on AI-assisted tools for navigating regulatory requirements.
A broader pathway for practitioners who have not received a notification but wish to contribute views on regulatory culture, practitioner wellbeing support, vulnerable cohorts, and priorities for system-level reform.
This initiative has been created to support discussion with professional organisations and stakeholders. Organisational endorsement remains to be determined. Submissions are stored anonymously and used only for aggregate analysis. No identifying information is required at any stage.
